NAPIER v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Bobby J. NAPIER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Department of Corrections, Appellees.

No. 4D20-65

Decided: April 01, 2020

Bobby J. Napier, Pahokee, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

Affirmed. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000) (recognizing that the conditional release statute does not violate the double jeopardy, due process, or ex post facto clauses); Fleming v. State, 697 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (acknowledging that there is no entitlement to credit for time spent on conditional release).

Per Curiam.

Levine, C.J., Gross and Ciklin, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network