MOTOR WERKS LLC v. MOTO WERKS LLC (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

MOTOR WERKS, LLC, Appellant, v. MOTO WERKS, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-2252

Decided: March 27, 2020

David A. Baker and Mark A. Cavins, of Law Office of David A. Baker, P.A., Rockledge, for Appellant. Charles Allen Schillinger, of Schillinger & Coleman, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.

Motor Werks, LLC (“Motor”), appeals the trial court's amended order requiring it to pay arrears to Moto Werks, LLC (“MWerks”). On appeal, Motor argues that MWerks recovered twice for the same debt. Following a review of the record, we conclude that Motor failed to present that argument below. Thus, this issue is not preserved for appeal. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1985))).

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

ORFINGER, COHEN and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network