LUSK v. STATE (2020)

Affirmed. See State v. Akins, 69 So. 3d 261, 269, 271 (Fla. 2011) (concluding that an orally pronounced sentence controls when there is a discrepancy between the oral sentence and written sentence as “written sentences are usually just a record of the actual sentence required to be pronounced in open court”) (quoting Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 2003)); see also Parker v. State, 276 So. 3d 108, 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (describing the correction of a written sentence to conform to the oral sentence to be “merely a ministerial act”) (quoting Frost v. State, 769 So. 2d 443, 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)).

Per Curiam.

Osterhaus, Kelsey, and Nordby, JJ., concur.