BRITO v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Katherine BRITO, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-1206

Decided: March 18, 2020

Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

Carrera & Amador, P.A., and Juan M. Carrera and Carmen G. Amador-Carrera, for appellant. Akerman LLP and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee), William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), and Eric M. Levine (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Delgado, 166 So. 3d 857, 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (noting: “Generally, appellate courts review a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence under an abuse of discretion standard.”) See also § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2019); Almendral v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 276 So. 3d 1003, 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (quoting Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Kee Wing, 210 So. 3d 216, 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), for the proposition that “[a] party seeking to reestablish a lost note may meet [the requirements of section 673.3091(1), Florida Statutes] either through a lost note affidavit or by testimony from a person with knowledge.”) (internal citations omitted).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network