Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant, v. GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC, Carlos Mendez, Rosa Mendez and Wyndham Lakes Estates Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellees.
Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”), appeals the trial court's involuntary dismissal of its action to foreclose a promissory note and mortgage at the close of its case in chief. Because we conclude BOA was not required to prove that its mortgage was superior to the interest of the property owner, Green Emerald Homes, LLC, we reverse.
Following several assignments, BOA became the owner of a note and mortgage executed by Carlos and Rose Mendez. When the Mendezes defaulted on their obligations, BOA filed a foreclosure action, naming Green Emerald as a defendant because Green Emerald allegedly owned the property.1 Green Emerald moved to dismiss the complaint, alleging, among other things, that the complaint failed to plead that BOA's interest was superior to Green Emerald's interest. The trial court denied the motion.
At trial, BOA proved the mortgage agreement, a default, acceleration, and the amount due—all the necessary elements of a foreclosure action. See Black Point Assets, Inc. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n (Fannie Mae), 220 So. 3d 566, 568 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). When BOA rested its case, Green Emerald moved for an involuntary dismissal, arguing that BOA had not proven that its interest in the property was superior to Green Emerald's interest. The trial court granted Green Emerald's motion and involuntarily dismissed the action. This was error.
“By naming a party in the complaint, the plaintiff provides notice to the named parties that the plaintiff is asserting a superior interest.” Id. The trial court errs when it dismisses an action for the failure of the plaintiff to allege or prove the superiority of its lien. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon for Bear Stearns Arm Tr., Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-7 v. Thompson, 230 So. 3d 638, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
Accordingly, we reverse the order involuntarily dismissing the action and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
FOOTNOTES
1. The complaint's “wherefore” clause requested the court to foreclose the interests of all named defendants, including Green Emerald.
PER CURIAM.
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D18-801
Decided: March 13, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)