PETRANO v. BAYLOR (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

David F. PETRANO, and Katherine Day-Petrano, Appellants, v. Darlene P. BAYLOR, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1334

Decided: March 12, 2020

David F. Petrano and Mary Katherine Day-Petrano, pro se, Hawthorne, Appellants. Ronald A. Hertel of Chiumento Dwyer Hertel Grant & Kistemaker, PL, Palm Coast, for Appellee.

Appellants challenge the final judgment of foreclosure and the amended final judgment of foreclosure on grounds that the trial court lacked jurisdiction, indispensable party defendants were not joined, the mortgage was ineffective to encumber the real property at issue, and other factual matters not preserved for appellate review. “Without a transcript, and in the absence of fundamental error on its face, an appellate court will affirm a trial court's decision.” Tramontana v. Bank of New York Mellon, 230 So. 3d 601, 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Appellants fail to establish any jurisdictional defect in the judgments on appeal. In addition, Appellants fail to show that the trial court committed any errors of fact or of law in the judgments based on the documents in the record. The orders on appeal are therefore Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Roberts, Bilbrey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network