Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Karen KERNAN, individually and as Trustee under the 3725 Helmig Land Trust Agreement, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-1, Appellee.
Karen Kernan, individually and as Trustee under the 3725 Helmig Land Trust Agreement, appeals the trial court's final judgment of foreclosure, order denying Ms. Kernan's motion for rehearing and to vacate final judgment, and order denying Ms. Kernan's objection and motion to vacate the sale and certificate of sale.
Ms. Kernan correctly argues and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1, correctly concedes that she is entitled to vacatur of the foreclosure sale because the sale occurred while Ms. Kernan's timely motion for rehearing was pending in the trial court. See Lowenstein v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 253 So. 3d 86, 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (“It is well settled that a foreclosure sale cannot be held while a timely motion for rehearing is pending because enforcement of a final judgment is suspended by the filing of the rehearing motion.” (quoting 944 CWELT–2007 LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A., 194 So. 3d 470, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016))); Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A., 137 So. 3d 1039, 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (“[W]e agree that the foreclosure sale of the property must be set aside because the sale was conducted while Hoffman's timely motion for rehearing was pending.”).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying Ms. Kernan's objection and motion to vacate the sale and certificate of sale, vacate the foreclosure sale, and remand with instructions for the trial court to set a new foreclosure sale date and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Hoffman, 137 So. 3d at 1039 (“Because the trial court disposed of the rehearing motion some time after the sale, the court may again order the foreclosure sale of the property on remand.”). We affirm in all other respects, without comment.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; vacated in part; remanded with directions.
LaROSE, Judge.
KHOUZAM, C.J., and VILLANTI, J., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 2D19-373
Decided: March 11, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)