Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
D.B., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).
Appellant's “Motion for ‘Evidentiary Hearing,’ ” “Motion for ‘Request for Guardian ad Litem,’ ” and “Motion Invoking Rule 11:, and Rule 38 FRAP” are not authorized filings in this appellate proceeding and are thus stricken.
This appeal is dismissed without prejudice to Appellant to seek relief in the trial court by petition for writ of habeas corpus. See R.Z. v. Dep't of Children and Families. 969 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007): see also In the Interest of E.H., 609 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1992). The Department of Children and Families' motion to dismiss is denied as moot.
Appellant's “Motion to Take Judicial Notice-Florida” is denied as moot.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: 2D19-4849
Decided: February 05, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)