LOAIZA v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Diego LOAIZA and Wendy Loaiza, Appellants, v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2399

Decided: February 26, 2020

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

Robert J. Galamaga, P.A., and Robert J. Galamaga, Miami, for appellants. Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A., and Robin I. Frank and Stuart A. Weinstein (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Cole v. Heritage Cmty.'s Inc., 838 So. 2d 1237, 1238 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (holding that after plaintiffs took no action, four years was “more than enough” to justify dismissal with prejudice); Ballestas v. Montego Assoc., 765 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (dismissing case after plaintiff was still unprepared for trial despite four previous continuances and being informed by the court that failure to be prepared for trial would result in dismissal).

HENDON, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network