BAHAD v. TRUST (2020)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Gabriela BAHAD, Appellant, v. Christiana TRUST, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-1520

Decided: January 29, 2020

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.

Alfonso E. Oviedo, for appellant. Storey Law Group, P.A., and Christian Gendreau (Orlando), for appellee.

Gabriela Bahad challenges the lower court's orders denying her objection to a foreclosure sale and her motion to stay it. We summarily affirm. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a); IndyMac Fed. Bank FSB v. Hagan, 104 So. 3d 1232, 1237-38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (affirming denial of objection to sale as facially deficient because no irregularity complained of was alleged to have taken place at sale); Solares v. City of Miami, 23 So. 3d 227, 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (dismissing as moot appeal from motion to stay sale of bonds pending trial where bonds were already sold).

We treat her appeal from the order denying her motion to disqualify the trial judge as a petition for a writ of prohibition and deny the same. See Spataru v. Fla. Dep't of Transp., 257 So. 3d 126, 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (holding order on motion to disqualify judge to be non-final, non-appealable order and treating appeal as petition for writ of prohibition); Santisteban v. State, 72 So. 3d 187, 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (affirming denial of motion to disqualify where it “fail[s] to allege any objectively reasonable fear of judicial bias”).

Affirmed; prohibition denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network