Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lucie Mae THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Appellant appeals the order summarily denying her Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. In denying Appellant’s motion, the postconviction court relied on Graham v. State, 160 So. 3d 108, 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Unlike in Graham, the trial court in this case lacked jurisdiction to enter a restitution order while Appellant’s direct appeal was pending. See Messina v. State, 160 So. 3d 523, 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Butler v. State, 951 So. 2d 38, 39-40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Accordingly, we reverse the order under review and remand this case to the trial court to conduct a new restitution hearing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
PER CURIAM.
EISNAUGLE, SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D19-804
Decided: January 10, 2020
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)