Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kenneth Lloyd SOMERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Appellant, Kenneth Lloyd Somers, appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant argues on appeal, inter alia, that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing (1) to test a knife for fingerprints, and (2) to call Mr. Glassmore as a witness at trial.
Specifically, Appellant argues that only the victim's fingerprints were on the knife, which would have supported his claim of self-defense. Further, he argues that Mr. Glassmore, his neighbor, would have directly contradicted law enforcement's testimony that Appellant was hiding in his neighbor's shed when law enforcement arrived. Instead, he alleges that Mr. Glassmore would have testified that Appellant ran over to his house to call 911, but that he decided not to call 911 when he heard sirens. Additionally, he alleges Mr. Glassmore would have testified that Appellant was returning to his home to meet with law enforcement as they arrived, and that he never entered the shed. Appellant observes that this testimony would have weakened the State's argument that hiding from law enforcement evidenced a guilty mind.
When a postconviction claim is properly made, a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing unless the record conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief. O'Callaghan v. State, 461 So. 2d 1354, 1355 (Fla. 1984). We conclude that Appellant's motion was sufficient as to these claims and these claims were not conclusively refuted by the records attached to the trial court's order. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach records that conclusively refute these claims or to hold an evidentiary hearing. We otherwise affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for further proceedings.
PER CURIAM.
EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case No. 5D19-896
Decided: December 13, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)