MACK v. STATE (2019)

Ciscely Mack appeals several criminal sentences. Among other issues, she contends that the trial court erroneously imposed a public defender fee of $300 in lower tribunal case number 17-7370 CF10A without providing her notice of the amount and of her right to contest the fee. See § 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1). The state concedes error, and we agree.

Consequently, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either reduce the fee to the statutory minimum or “hold a hearing with proper notice to obtain evidence in support of a public defender fee in an amount greater than the statutory minimum.” Alexis v. State, 211 So. 3d 81, 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

With respect to the public defender fee in case number 17-11234 CF10A, we affirm because Mack agreed to pay this fee as part of her plea agreement. See Davis v. State, 677 So. 2d 1366, 1368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

As to the remaining argument, we affirm without further discussion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

Per Curiam.

Ciklin, Gerber and Forst, JJ., concur.