CROSIER v. CROSIER (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Kandi CROSIER, Appellant, v. Clayton L. CROSIER, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4711

Decided: December 04, 2019

Kandi Crosier, pro se, Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.

Appellant's having been given ample time to supplement the record with the hearing transcript, yet having failed to do so, we must affirm the trial court's order denying her motion to dismiss the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence with Minor Children. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (noting that a trial court's decision is presumed correct, an appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error, and the absence of a transcript makes it impossible to show reversible error); see also Halpern v. Koikos, 255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (same).

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Wolf, Roberts, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network