Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Fenton WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. CITIZEN PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
A homeowner, Fenton Williams, appeals an order compelling appraisal. The homeowner argues in part that the trial court applied the wrong standard in determining whether the insurance company waived its right to appraisal. The insurance company acknowledges that the trial court mistakenly concluded that the insurer could not invoke appraisal until coverage was determined but argues that we should affirm for other reasons. We reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider this issue under the correct standard.
At the insurance company's invitation, the trial court relied on Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. v. Martucci, 152 So. 3d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014), and reasoned that the company could not have waived appraisal by taking inconsistent action until after coverage was resolved. Martucci addresses an insured's right to appraisal. An insured cannot seek appraisal until coverage is determined. An insurer, however, can invoke appraisal and still retain a coverage defense. See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Licea, 685 So. 2d 1285, 1288 (Fla. 1996); Liberty Am. Ins. Co. v. Kennedy, 890 So. 2d 539, 541–42 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (recognizing that “submission of the claim to appraisal does not foreclose Liberty American from challenging an element of loss as not being covered by the policy”). On appeal, the insurance company agrees that it could have invoked appraisal earlier.
Because the trial court mistakenly believed that the insurer had to await determination of coverage, the court did not rule on the homeowner's full waiver argument. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider whether the insurer's actions in this case amount to waiver.
Per Curiam.
Levine, C.J., Gross, and Forst, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D19-412
Decided: November 27, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)