Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marie LAFLEUR, Appellant, v. The ARBOR HOLDING COMPANY LLC d/b/a Barrington Terrace of Fort Myers and United Wisconsin Insurance Company, Appellees.
In this workers' compensation case, Claimant appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying Claimant the right to select the doctor who would serve as her one-time change of physician available under section 440.13(2)(f), Florida Statutes (2014). We reverse on the authority of Myers v. Pasco County School Board, 246 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018),* because the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the JCC's finding that the Employer/Carrier's authorization of an anesthesiologist, although made within five calendar days of Claimant's request for a one-time change, satisfied their statutory obligation to provide a physician in the “same” specialty as the previously authorized physician who specializes in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Section 440.13(2)(f) contemplates that the originally authorized physician be “in the same specialty as the changed physician.” Myers held that “[a] physician who provides similar services in a different specialty does not qualify as a doctor in the ‘same specialty’ because—quite simply—‘same’ is different than ‘similar.’ ” Id. at 1279.
Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE. The JCC did not have the benefit of the Myers opinion before rendering the order under review.
Ray, J.
Roberts and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D18-0381
Decided: June 12, 2019
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)