MCDONOUGH v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dr. James Eric MCDONOUGH, Appellant, v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D21-1545

Decided: November 10, 2022

Before LOGUE, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

Dr. James Eric McDonough, in proper person. Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee City of Homestead.

Affirmed. See Fla. Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP, 221 So. 3d 1260, 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“The proper standard utilized in reviewing a trial court's decision on a petition for writ of mandamus is abuse of discretion.”); Florida Holding 4800, LLC v. Lauderhill Lending, LLC, 275 So. 3d 183, 187 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (“[A] party cannot successfully complain about an error for which he or she is responsible or of rulings that he or she has invited the trial court to make.” (quoting Millsaps v. Kaltenbach, 152 So. 3d 803, 805 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014))); Vidal v. Liquidation Props., Inc., 104 So. 3d 1274, 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (finding that if an “issue was waived, it cannot be grounds for reversal on appeal”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network