MACK v. STATE (2026)

Dismissed. See Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So. 2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“[P]oints of law adjudicated in a prior appeal are binding in order to promote stability of judicial decisions and to avoid piecemeal litigation.”) (quotation omitted); Zuluaga v. State, Dep't of Corr., 32 So. 3d 674, 676–77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Habeas corpus is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals of issues which were raised or should have been raised on direct appeal, or which could have been, should have been, or were raised in post-conviction proceedings.”); Mack v. State, 426 So. 3d 655, 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 2026) (“Mack is procedurally barred from raising his claim before us in the first instance.”); see also State v. S.M., 131 So. 3d 780, 784 (Fla. 2013) (“A petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied when the petitioner fails to provide the district court with an adequate record to review the petition.”).

PER CURIAM.