PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS OF FL INC v. BRITT (2018)

Affirmed. Given the actual notice Appellant received of the pending lawsuit and various critical proceedings therein, including the notice of trial, and the fact that there was no contact between Appellant and Appellee's counsel regarding Appellant's claim against Appellee, we find this case clearly distinguishable from M.W. v. SPCP Group V, LLC, 163 So.3d 518, 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), and affirm because the judgment was therefore not void under the authority of Bank of New York Mellon v. Condominium Association of La Mer Estates, Inc., 175 So.3d 282, 285 (Fla. 2015) (quoting Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So.2d 443, 445 (Fla. 1990) (“It is well settled that where a court is legally organized and has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the adverse parties are given an opportunity to be heard, then errors, irregularities or wrongdoing in proceedings, short of illegal deprivation of opportunity to be heard, will not render the judgment void.”) ).

PER CURIAM.