MALO v. BANK OF NEW YORK (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nathalian MALO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17–0092

Decided: December 21, 2017

Upon consideration, appellee’s motion to dispense with oral argument is granted.

Upon the Court’s own motion, it is ordered that the above styled appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely filed. See Yellow Cab Co. v. Ewing, 225 So. 3d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

SUAREZ, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network