Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Christopher Donnell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
The defendant timely appeals his sentences for various drug possession charges. We agree with his assertion that the sentence imposed for count I exceeds the statutory maximum sentence. Thus, we reverse his sentence on that count only. We find the remainder of his arguments to be without merit or not preserved.
The defendant pled nolo contendere to count I, possession of twenty grams or less of cannabis, and count II, possession of ethylone, a controlled substance. He was sentenced to four years in the custody of the Department of Corrections on each charge, which sentences were to be served concurrently. Williams then moved to correct a sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), alleging in pertinent part that the sentence for count I exceeded the statutory maximum of one year. In response, the state conceded that the sentence for count I should not have exceeded one year, and the trial court granted the motion as to this ground. However, as the state candidly concedes on appeal, it does not appear that an order was entered to actually correct the sentence on count I.
Possession of twenty grams or less of cannabis is a first-degree misdemeanor. § 893.13(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016). A first-degree misdemeanor may be punished by a term of incarceration not exceeding one year. § 775.082(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016).
As both the state and the trial court recognized, the court erred in entering Williams' four-year sentence in excess of the statutory maximum. We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing on count I. We affirm the sentence for the remaining count.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Per Curiam.
Gross, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D16–3402
Decided: November 08, 2017
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)