LEIGHDON HENRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

LEIGHDON HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-92

Decided: November 03, 2017

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Leighdon Henry, Malone, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We grant Leighdon Henry's Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our earlier per curiam affirmance and substitute the following in its place.

As to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, the sentencing documents shall, on remand, be amended to reflect that Henry is entitled to a review of his sentence after serving twenty years, not twenty years after the date of his initial sentencing. See § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014); Tyson v. State, 199 So. 3d 1087, 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PER CURIAM.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network