Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ishsha SHALEM, Petitioner, v. Daniel JUNIOR, etc., et al., Respondents.
Petitioner Ishsha Shalem petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus claiming her pretrial detention without bond is unlawful. We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court.
A review of the record shows that the Petitioner was ordered detained without any condition for pretrial release pending trial. She was originally arrested on February 5, 2016 and a bond was set. The information charged the Petitioner with one count of child neglect with no harm. Petitioner was to appear for arraignment on March 16, 2016 and failed to appear. She was arrested on capias warrant on October 18, 2017 and her case was heard twice, on October 18 and 19, 2017. Bond was requested but denied. The record and transcripts from the hearings show that the requirements of section 907.041, Florida Statutes (2017) and Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.131 and 3.132 were not followed, and the trial court failed to make the proper findings before ordering pretrial detention.
Therefore, we grant the petition for habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court. The State shall have until 5:00 p.m. Friday October 27, 2017, to file a legally sufficient motion for pretrial detention if it chooses to do so. The trial court shall, no later than Monday, October 30, 2017, conduct a hearing pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.131 and 3.132, to determine appropriate conditions of release or detention, and any pretrial detention order shall comport with the requirements of section 907.041, Florida Statutes (2017). The defendant shall remain in custody pending the determination of pretrial release or detention.
This opinion shall take effect immediately notwithstanding the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.
SUAREZ, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D17–2312
Decided: October 27, 2017
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)