Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, Appellants, v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company, Appellee. (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, Appellants, v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1917

Decided: October 04, 2017

Before LOGUE, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Perry & Neblett, P.A., and David A. Neblett and Jack Wynn, for appellants. Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Berard Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, the plaintiffs below, appeal an order granting final summary judgment in favor of their insurer, Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company. Upon Tower Hill's commendable confession of error, and because genuine issues of material fact exist as to the amount of the actual cash value of the insured loss at hand, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See § 627.7011(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 3D16-1861, at *10-11 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 30, 2017); Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1565 (Fla. 3d DCA July 12, 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network