Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Eugene Allen, Petitioner, v. The State of Florida, Respondent.
Eugene Allen files this petition for writ of certiorari seeking to compel the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) to restore gain time he previously forfeited due to violation of his conditional release. We deny the writ without prejudice to Allen obtaining a final order from DOC from which Allen can seek mandamus relief in the circuit court.
“The proper remedy to compel an award of gain time is a petition for writ of mandamus filed in the circuit court after administrative procedures through DOC have been exhausted.” Duggan v. Dep't of Corrections, 665 So. 2d 1152, 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (emphasis added). While not entirely clear on the scant record before us, it appears the trial court found that it was without jurisdiction to consider, and therefore denied, Allen's petition for writ of mandamus because Allen did not exhaust DOC administrative procedures prior to seeking relief in the circuit court. Specifically, the only thing in the record before us is an unsigned memorandum—purportedly from someone working at the Bureau of Classification Management for DOC to Everglades Correctional Institution, where Allen is currently incarcerated—which states that Allen is ineligible for restoration of gain time.
While Allen may have initiated an administrative remedy, it does not appear to us that DOC has taken final action in this matter. Therefore, it appears the trial court properly denied Allen's mandamus petition because it lacked jurisdiction. Similarly we deny Allen's petition for writ of certiorari without prejudice so that Allen may exhaust his administrative remedies and, if unsuccessful, file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court.
Petition denied.
SCALES, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D17-1907
Decided: September 20, 2017
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)