CARTER v. LAWSON (2017)

Anthony D. CARTER, Petitioner, v. Richard S. LAWSON, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17–0937

Decided: June 27, 2017

Anthony D. Carter, pro se, Petitioner. Richard S. Lawson, pro se, Respondent.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion to hear and rule, motion to compel answers to request for admissions and interrogatories, and amended motion to compel answers to interrogatories within a reasonable time, not to exceed sixty days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

PER CURIAM.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network