PESTANA v. PALM SPRINGS GENERAL HOSPITAL INC (2017)

Damarys Diaz PESTANA, Appellant, v. PALM SPRINGS GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D16–685

Decided: June 21, 2017

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.

Damarys Diaz Pestana, in proper person. Nosich & Ganz, P.A., and Marc P. Ganz and Adam D. Santana, for appellee.

The appellant seeks review of the trial court's order granting final summary judgment in favor of the appellee. “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate where, as a matter of law, it is apparent from the pleadings, depositions, affidavits, or other evidence that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to relief as a matter of law.” Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006). Given the record before us, there was no genuine issue of material fact and the appellee was entitled to relief as a matter of law. Id.; See Sokoloff v. Oceania I Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 201 So. 3d 664, 664–65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Affirmed.

LOGUE, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network