Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOSEPH S. SCIANDRA and LISA SCIANDRA Appellants, v. PENNYMAC CORP. Appellee.
Joseph and Lisa Sciandra appeal a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of PennyMac Corp. The Sciandras argue that the trial court improperly awarded attorney's fees of $11,309 to PennyMac because PennyMac failed to present expert testimony as to the reasonableness of their attorney's hourly rate and hours expended. We agree. See Sourcetrack, LLC v. Ariba, Inc., 34 So. 3d 766, 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (first citing Snow v. Harlan Bakeries, Inc., 932 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); then citing Yakubik v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs, 656 So. 2d 591, 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)).
We thus reverse the award of attorney's fees, and remand with instructions to reduce the amount of the final judgment of $657,262.35 by $11,309 to $645,953.35.1 We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure in all other respects.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.
FOOTNOTES
1. Generally, if a prevailing party fails to present independent expert testimony to support an award of fees at the trial level, but the record is not completely devoid of evidence as to the rate and hours of the prevailing party's trial counsel, we would remand for a further determination as to the amount of the prevailing party's fees. Snow, 932 So. 2d at 413 (citing Rodriguez v. Campbell, 720 So. 2d 266, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)). However, PennyMac has stipulated that this court should simply subtract the award of fees and costs from the amount of the final judgment without the need for remand.
BADALAMENTI, Judge.
CASANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 2D15-5189
Decided: May 19, 2017
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)