CODY HUGGINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

CODY HUGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5608

Decided: May 12, 2017

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm Cody Huggins' judgments and sentences and the revocation of his probation. However, the order of revocation of probation entered on December 4, 2015, does not identify the conditions found to have been violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the condition(s) of probation that Mr. Huggins violated. See Greene v. State, 919 So. 2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant.”).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

PER CURIAM.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network