TYLER WEISMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

TYLER WEISMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-27

Decided: May 12, 2017

William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

We affirm the trial court's decision revoking Tyler Weisman's probation except as to the alleged violation of special condition E. As to that special condition, we conclude the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of a willful violation. As a result, on remand, the trial court shall strike the finding of a violation of special condition E from the order of revocation. Because it is clear the trial court would have revoked Mr. Weisman's probation without considering the alleged violation of special condition E, we affirm. See Lee v. State, 67 So. 3d 1199, 1201-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF CORRECTED ORDER.

PER CURIAM.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network