Herman P. Maestas, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2017)

Herman P. Maestas, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D15–4774

Decided: February 22, 2017

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant's probation as supported by competent evidence showing his willful and substantial violations. We also agree with the State's concession of error, and remand for entry of a written order specifying each condition of probation the appellant violated. See Oertel v. State, 82 So.3d 152, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Robinson v. State, 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case.”); King v. State, 46 So.3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Revocation affirmed, but remanded for entry of revocation order consistent with this opinion.

Per Curiam.

Levine, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network