JAMIE ILLESCAS MARTHA ILLESCAS v. BRENT EDWARD BARIS ESQUIRE BRENT BARIS (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

JAMIE ILLESCAS and MARTHA ILLESCAS, Appellants, v. BRENT EDWARD BARIS, ESQUIRE and BRENT E. BARIS, P.A., Appellees.

No. 4D15-4781

Decided: February 01, 2017

David J. Chestnut of David J. Chestnut, P.A., Stuart, for appellants. Scott A. Cole and Alexandra Valdes of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

We affirm the summary judgment entered. Appellant contends that the issue of whether the note in question in this case was usurious was not conclusively refuted in the record. The note on its face is not usurious, and appellant's affidavit which merely states that the note was usurious without any calculations is insufficient to raise an issue of material fact. Eastland Inv. Co. v. Baker, 344 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

WARNER and GROSS, JJ., and SINGHAL, RAAG, Associate Judge, concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network