CHARLES LEE SEMKO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2016)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

CHARLES LEE SEMKO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-996

Decided: December 02, 2016

Charles Lee Semko, Milton, pro se. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

In this Anders appeal ¹ , we affirm as to all issues raised by Appellant, Charles L. Semko. However, we note a scrivener's error in the sentence. The trial court orally pronounced that the statutory maximum sentence would be imposed for Count Two (grand theft), which is five years in prison; but the written judgment reflects a sentence of fifteen years for that count. We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to correct this scrivener's error.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

PER CURIAM.

SAWAYA, TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network