CABRILLO DEVELOPMENT LLC v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC (2015)

CABRILLO DEVELOPMENT, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D15–328.

Decided: December 23, 2015

Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and EMAS, JJ.

Paul Morris, for appellants. Kopelowitz OstrowFerguson Weiselberg, John J. Shahady, Brian R. Kopelowitz and Alexis Fields (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Cabrillo Development, LLC and James and Tudor Austin appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (“Bayview”), following a nonjury trial. Appellants assert, inter alia, that Bayview lacked standing to foreclose on the property at issue and that Bayview was not a holder in due course.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure, concluding that there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's determinations that Bayview had standing, and that Bayview was a holder in due course as provided in section 673.3021(1), Florida Statutes (2010). See § 673.3051, Fla. Stat. (2010); Bank of Miami v. Fla. City Express, Inc., 367 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Barclays Bank P.L.C. v. Conkey, 695 So.2d 931 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network