Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kelcey Jerel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Based upon our independent review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm Kelcey Jerel Williams' judgment, sentence, and revocation of probation without further comment. However, we remand with directions to correct a scrivener's error that appears in both the judgment and the order of revocation of probation.
Mr. Williams was charged with burglary of an occupied conveyance and petit theft. He pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of attempted burglary of an occupied conveyance, the petit theft charge was nolle prossed, and Mr. Williams was sentenced to twenty-four months' probation on January 8, 2014.
On June 19, 2014, Mr. Williams admitted to violating his probation. The trial court revoked Mr. Williams' probation and sentenced him to eighteen months in prison. The judgment and order of revocation of probation, however, list the charge as burglary of an occupied conveyance, a second-degree felony, see § 810.02(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013), not attempted burglary of an occupied conveyance, a third-degree felony, see §§ 810.02(3)(d), 777.04(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013).1 Accordingly, we affirm but remand for correction of the judgment and order of revocation of probation to reflect the correct crime-attempted burglary of an occupied conveyance, a third-degree felony.
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
FOOTNOTES
1. The sentencing scoresheet properly lists the offense as attempted burglary of an occupied conveyance, a third-degree felony.
CASANUEVA, Judge.
ALTENBERND and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D14–3282.
Decided: May 27, 2015
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)