Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jerry GALLION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Appellant, Jerry Gallion, appeals an order denying his postconviction relief motion which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find no error in the trial court's denial of relief as to Grounds 1, 3, and 6 following an evidentiary hearing. However, because the trial court summarily denied Grounds 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 without attaching portions of the record conclusively refuting the claims, a fact acknowledged by the State, we reverse and remand with instructions that the court either attach such portions of the record or hold an evidentiary hearing on the claims. See Wainwright v. State, 896 So.2d 695, 698 (Fla.2004) (noting that a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief claim unless the motion and record conclusively show that he or she is entitled to no relief or where the claim is legally insufficient); Simmons v. State, 66 So.3d 327, 327–28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (reversing for record attachments or for an evidentiary hearing where the trial court failed to assemble a record from which it could be conclusively determined that the appellant was not entitled to any relief on his facially sufficient rule 3.850 claim); Washington v. State, 10 So.3d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“If the postconviction defendant's claims are legally sufficient, the trial court must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claims.”).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.
PER CURIAM.
LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D13–2905.
Decided: December 09, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)