Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael W. LEVINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Michael W. Levine appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In 2004, Levine was charged with attempted first-degree murder with a firearm and other offenses. He entered into a negotiated plea to the lesser offense of attempted second-degree murder with a firearm with discharge causing great bodily harm, as well as shooting into an occupied vehicle and discharge of a firearm from a vehicle. The trial court sentenced him to fifty years in prison with a twenty-five year minimum mandatory for the attempted second-degree murder and fifteen years for the other offenses. In the motion at issue, Levine contends that the fifty year sentence on the attempted second-degree murder count is illegal. We agree.
Attempted second-degree murder is a second degree felony. § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (2003); § 777.04(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). The use of a firearm reclassifies the offense to a first-degree felony. § 775.087(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003). The fifty-year sentence exceeds the statutory maximum of thirty years and is illegal. Wiley v. State, 125 So.3d 235, 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding that section 775.087(2)(a)3. authorizes a court to give a mandatory minimum term between twenty-five years up to life but a “judge may give a sentence over the mandatory minimum selected only if ‘authorized by law’ ”). Here, the court imposed only a twenty-five year mandatory minimum. The fifty-year sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, is not otherwise authorized by law, and is therefore illegal. Antoine v. State, 138 So.3d 1064, 1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Walden v. State, 121 So.3d 660, 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
The order denying Levine's motion to correct illegal sentence is reversed, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings.
We certify that our decision is in conflict with Kelly v. State, 137 So.3d 2, 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014),1 where the First District Court of Appeal disagreed with Wiley.
Reversed and Remanded.
FOOTNOTES
1. A petition for discretionary review is pending in Kelly v. State, No. SC14–916.
PER CURIAM.
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., STEVENSON and FORST, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 4D13–4596.
Decided: October 15, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)