Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PALMS WEST HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Palms West Hospital, Appellant, v. D.W. and R.W., individually and as parents and next friends of L.W ., a minor and Florida Birth Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association and Steven Pliskow, M.D., Appellees.
Appellant, Palms West Hospital Limited Partnership d/b/a Palms West Hospital appeals the final order of the Division of Administrative Hearings finding that the hospital failed to provide sufficient notice pursuant to section 766.316, Florida Statutes (2012), governing the Birth–Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (NICA). The effect of the order is to permit either acceptance of NICA benefits for a brain-damaged infant or pursuit of a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. See Florida Birth–Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n v. Dep't of Admin. Hearings, 29 So.3d 992, 999 (Fla.2010). We affirm the order.
On appeal, the hospital does not challenge the administrative law judge's finding that the hospital failed to provide the mother with sufficient notice under NICA. §§ 766.301 to 766.316, Fla. Stat. (2012). Rather, the hospital's argument on appeal centers on language in the order regarding the election of remedies. It contends that the administrative law judge had no jurisdiction to allow the parents to make an election of remedies, reject the child's NICA benefits, and close the case without having a circuit court-appointed guardian ad litem. The specific language in the order provides:
in the event Petitioners file an election of remedies declining or rejecting the NICA benefits, this case will be dismissed and DOAH's file will be closed.
We affirm, as we do not construe the foregoing language to be anything more than a statement that if an election of remedies is made rejecting the NICA benefits, the file would be closed. Whether there has been an appropriate waiver of benefits and whether a guardian must be appointed are matters to be litigated before the circuit court should a medical malpractice suit be pursued.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
WARNER, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 4D13–2501.
Decided: October 15, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)