Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David E. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
We reverse the trial court's order summarily denying David E. Jones's motion for additional jail credit pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. Rule 3.801, which governs jail credit claims, requires the defendant to raise the claim within one year after the sentence becomes final. However, the rule further provides that “[f]or sentences imposed prior to July 1, 2013, a motion under this rule may be filed on or before July 1, 2014.” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(b). Jones's sentence became final on October 26, 2012, and he filed the rule 3.801 motion on November 4, 2013. Thus, as the State properly concedes, the provision applies, and the trial court erred in denying Jones's motion as untimely. Nevertheless, the motion is deficient as it did not include the requisite oath pursuant to rule 3.801(c). Because the motion is compliant in all other respects, Jones is entitled to an opportunity to amend his motion pursuant to rule 3.801(e). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(e) (incorporating Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) (providing that if motion is facially insufficient, trial court must give defendant 60 days to amend).
For these reasons, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to strike the rule 3.801 motion for failure to include the requisite oath, and afford Jones an opportunity to file an amended motion compliant with the rule.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER, J.
EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 5D14–252.
Decided: August 01, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)