Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ARNOLD KYLE NICHOLSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502011CF005255AXXXMB.
Arnold Kyle Nicholson, Florida City, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia L. Comras, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
We reverse the trial court's denial of appellant's motion for additional jail credit and remand for the award of the proper amount of credit. Appellant was initially arrested for defrauding an innkeeper and obstructing an officer without violence. He spent 35 days in jail and was released when the State failed to file formal charges. The state, however, subsequently charged him with grand theft, and he was again arrested. Ultimately, he entered a plea to the grand theft charge and was sentenced to 61 days “time served” which included all the time he served in jail since his initial arrest for defrauding an innkeeper. This time-served sentence was followed by two years of probation.
Appellant violated probation, and the court ultimately sentenced him to 18 months in prison with credit for only 35 days for time spent in jail before sentencing following his arrest for the grand theft charge. Appellant's motion establishes that he is entitled to the 61 days of jail credit previously awarded as a “time served” sentence in this case and any additional time served in jail before the revocation of probation and sentence. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to award the proper amount of credit.
Reversed and remanded.
May, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.
* * *
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D14–264
Decided: July 09, 2014
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)