CROFT v. STATE (2013)

David Dean CROFT, a/k/a David Dark Horse, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D13–1715.

Decided: December 20, 2013

David Dean Croft, pro se.

David Dean Croft, a/k/a David Dark Horse, appeals the postconviction court order dismissing in part and summarily denying in part his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. However, as to Mr. Croft's claim challenging his presumptive parole release date, our affirmance is without prejudice to pursue his administrative remedies with the Florida Parole Commission. If he is unsuccessful, he may seek mandamus relief in the appropriate circuit court. See Werts v. State, 113 So.3d 859 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Sullivan v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 920 So.2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network