RAYMOND GREGG v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2013)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

RAYMOND GREGG, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D12–4532

Decided: November 20, 2013

The defendant appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion. We affirm. The claims are untimely and successive. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); Parks v. State, 101 So.3d 1265, 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“Defendant's motion did not present any valid exceptions to the time limitations under the rule․ Further, Defendant's motion was successive as the claims could have been raised in one of his previous motions.”) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1243–44 (Fla.2004)).

Affirmed.

Warner, Gerber and Levine, JJ., concur.

* * *

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98–9109 CF10A.

Raymond Gregg, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melvin G. Mosier, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network