PROCTOR v. TWO OCEAN MOPED RENTAL INC (2012)

Mark PROCTOR and Carolyn Proctor, Petitioner, v. TWO OCEAN MOPED RENTAL, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 3D12–1695.

Decided: November 28, 2012

Before SALTER and EMAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Clifton C. Curry, Jr., Daniel W. King and Steven Brannock (Brandon) for petitioner. Erik W. Scharf and Wayne R. Atkins; Jason Weber, for respondents.

We deny the petition on the merits. Given the procedural posture in which this case has arrived at this Court, we take no further action. Upon a review of the record below, however, we do note that this petition originates from an order which granted a default judgment against some (but not all) of the corporate defendants. This default judgment was evidently granted upon the premise that these defaulted corporate defendants were not represented by counsel. That premise, however, appears to be incorrect, as the record provided by the parties evidences that all corporate defendants were in fact represented by counsel at the time the trial court granted the motion for default judgment. The motion to withdraw was filed some ten days after the motion for default judgment was granted. The motion to withdraw was granted in an order entered sixteen days after the motion for default judgment was granted.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network