Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FIRST REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellant, v. Karen T. GRANT, individually and as Karen T. Grant, Trustee, Chip Harbour, III, individually and as managing member of CBH Properties, LLC, Stephen D. Bachman, William Mathieu, World of Realty of Bay County, Inc., Beach Boys Realty, Inc., Ocean Reef Developers, LLC, and Ocean Reef Developers, II, LLC, Appellees.
ON MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES
Appellant filed a breach of contract action against Appellee Bachman and others. Judgment was entered in favor of Bachman and Appellant appealed. Shortly after the clerk of the lower tribunal filed the record index, and prior to the parties filing any briefs, Appellant voluntarily dismissed the appeal under rule 9.350(b). Bachman seeks an award of attorney's fees as the prevailing party in this appeal.
The contract at issue in this case includes a prevailing party attorney's fee provision, which by virtue of section 59.46, Florida Statutes, includes appellate attorney's fees. Appellant appears to concede that Bachman is the prevailing party in this appeal, but it objects to an award of appellate attorney's fees on the basis that “appellee's involvement in this appeal has been de minimus.”
There is support for Appellant's position in Sanchez v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company, 997 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). However, we agree with Judge Shepherd's dissent in that case that there is no de minimis exception when determining entitlement to a fee award. Id. at 1210. Although the dismissal of this appeal at an early stage will certainly impact the amount of fees awarded, it has no bearing on Bachman's entitlement to fees.
Accordingly, we grant Bachman's motion for appellate attorney's fees, and we remand this case to the trial court to determine the amount of the award if the parties are unable to agree on an amount.
MOTION GRANTED; CASE REMANDED.
PER CURIAM.
ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D12–0614.
Decided: June 06, 2012
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)