RUSHETSKY v. RUSHETSKY (2011)

Adam S. RUSHETSKY, Appellant, v. Valerie J. RUSHETSKY, Appellee.

No. 4D10–2167.

Decided: November 23, 2011

Keith A. Fousek of Law Office of Keith A. Fousek, P.A., North Lauderdale, for appellant. William L. Gardiner III of Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

The husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute requires affirmance except where there is clear error on the face of the judgment. Matteis v. Matteis, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D2029 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 14, 2011); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). The wife concedes error in the $24 a month credit for noncovered medical expenses, as the child support guidelines worksheet also requires the husband to be 41% responsible for any noncovered medical expenses. As such, we reverse and remand for recalculation of child support without this credit. As to the other issues, we find no clear error on the face of the judgment and thus affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

PER CURIAM.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network