Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MICHAEL LASHER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Affirmed. See Flowers v. State, 54 So.3d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that Arizona v. Gant, 129 S.Ct. 1710 (2009), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review); State v. Harris, 58 So.3d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding suppression was not warranted under good faith exception to exclusionary rule where vehicle search was conducted prior to issuance of Gant ).
Warner, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.
* * *
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07–3344 CF10A.
Michael Lasher, Blountstown, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D10–2714
Decided: June 22, 2011
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)