Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Petitioner, v. Thomas and Michelle TORBERT, Respondents.
Miami-Dade County (“the County”) petitioned this Court for second-tier certiorari review of a Miami-Dade Circuit Court Appellate Division opinion. We grant the petition.
Thomas and Michelle Torbert (“the Torberts”) own property zoned for agricultural use in Miami-Dade County. The Torberts applied to develop the property pursuant to a plat zoning exception. After a zoning hearing, the County denied the application.
The Torberts appealed to the circuit court, and the circuit court reversed the lower tribunal. The circuit court issued a one-sentence opinion which stated, “[t]he Miami-Date County Board of the County Commission (BOCC) failed to follow the applicable law and its decision was not based on substantial competent evidence.” The County appealed.
On second-tier review, this Court determines whether the circuit court afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law. Dusseau v. Metro. Dade County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 794 So.2d 1270, 1274 (Fla.2001). This Court has held that an appellate court “cannot issue what amounts to a ‘Per Curiam Reversal,’ that is, a reversal without a written opinion.” State Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Trauth, 937 So.2d 758, 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Here, the circuit court's opinion fails to explain the reason for reversing the lower tribunal. Thus, the circuit court issued an opinion which amounts to a per curiam reversal. In so doing, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law.
Accordingly, we grant certiorari, quash the circuit court opinion, and remand for further proceedings.
Petition granted.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D10-349.
Decided: July 07, 2010
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)