Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CABO RICO YACHTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Guy MARTINACHE, Fraser Smith, and Edith Smith, Appellees.
Plaintiff, Guy Martinache, sued defendant, Cabo Rico Yachts, Inc., after it failed to return a deposit plaintiff paid for construction of a boat that was never delivered to plaintiff. Defendant appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on plaintiff's breach of contract and fraud claims. We affirm summary judgment on the breach of contract claim. However, we reverse summary judgment on the fraud claim, as plaintiff's motion for summary judgment did not request summary judgment on that count and plaintiff did not submit any evidence of fraud. See Williams v. Bank of America Corp., 927 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (holding that it is reversible error to enter summary judgment on a ground not raised with particularity in the motion); Sheridan Healthcorp, Inc. v. Amko, 993 So.2d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (reversing summary judgment where movant did not submit evidence, stating that “[i]n summary judgment proceedings, the burden is not on the opponent to submit evidence until the movant tenders competent evidence in support of the motion.”). Here, the record fails to establish that defendant acted fraudulently when he took the deposit. See Wadlington v. Cont'l Med. Servs., Inc., 907 So.2d 631, 632-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (noting that in fraud cases the issue of whether a defendant had the intention to perform an act at the time the promise was made is generally a jury question).
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
PER CURIAM.
GROSS, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D08-2900.
Decided: November 04, 2009
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)