Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Craig SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
We affirm appellant's convictions for robbery with a firearm and carjacking with a firearm. However, we reverse and remand appellant's sentence. Appellant was given two life sentences for these convictions as a Prison Releasee Reoffender pursuant to section 775.082(9)(a)3, Florida Statutes (“PRRPA”). Appellant was also given two ten-year mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes (“10-20-Life”). The mandatory minimum sentences imposed were not greater than appellant's life sentences as a Prison Releasee Reoffender. Therefore, they are illegal and must be set aside. See Smith v. State, 813 So.2d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(reversing and remanding for resentencing where sentence pursuant to 10-20-Life statute was not greater than the PRRPA sentences); see also Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655, 659 (Fla.2000).
Appellant filed a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to correct the illegal sentence on June 6, 2002. The trial court did not grant the motion until August 20. As explained in Blake v. State, 814 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), a trial court's jurisdiction to rule on a motion to correct a sentencing error ends once sixty days pass with no action on the motion. Id. at 1164 (citing Hart v. State, 773 So.2d 1263, 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)). As a result, the trial court's subsequent order modifying appellant's sentence was a nullity. Id. (citing Kimbrough v. State, 766 So.2d 1255, 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)).
Accordingly, we reverse appellant's ten-year mandatory minimum sentences and remand this case with instructions to resentence appellant to two life sentences as a Prison Releasee Reoffender.
REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.
PER CURIAM.
SHAHOOD, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D01-4050.
Decided: April 23, 2003
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)