Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dennis WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Dennis M. Watkins (Watkins) appeals his convictions and sentences for marijuana-related offenses in two cases, consolidated before us for review. He argues that the inclusion of cannabis as a schedule I drug in section 893.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), is unconstitutional.1 We affirm.
Forty-eight-year-old Watkins committed these crimes on October 30, 1994, when he distributed marijuana cigarettes at a Gainesville rally to legalize marijuana-a “doobie toss”; and on August 11, 1995, when the police searched his residence and surrounding premises. He reserved the right to challenge the constitutionality of the statute classifying cannabis as a schedule I drug.
Watkins argues that cannabis currently has accepted medical uses for the treatment of illnesses, that its use under medical supervision meets accepted safety standards, and that its potential for abuse is low. His claim that the inclusion of cannabis as a schedule I drug denies him due process and equal protection has been rejected previously. The Florida Supreme Court holds that the placement of cannabis in schedule I of the list of controlled substances in section 893.03 is constitutional. State v. Cheatham, 376 So.2d 1167 (Fla.1979); see also Hamilton v. State, 366 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla.1978) (“[T]he fact that there continues to be expert opinion supporting the reasons which prompted the Legislature to enact this statute is sufficient to constitute a continuing rational basis for the act.”); Town v. State, 377 So.2d 648, 651 (Fla.1979) (affirming the trial court's injunction against the use of cannabis in religious practice).
The record before us in the instant case contains expert testimony sufficient to satisfy us that there continues to be a rational basis for the inclusion of cannabis under Schedule I.
Watkins' convictions and sentences are affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. No claim is made in the instant appeal that the appeal is prompted by any statutory amendment. Cannabis has been a schedule I drug since 1973. See § 893.03, Fla. Stat. (1973); ch. 73-331, § 3, at 788, Laws of Fla.
LAWRENCE, Judge.
WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Nos. 96-2757, 96-4331.
Decided: October 21, 1997
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)